Hâtvalues

Not All Skew Is Suspicious - How to Avoid Mistaking Signal for Outliers

Julian Hatwell
Last Updated:
Table of Contents

Not All Skew Is Suspicious #

Introduction #

You’re exploring your data. You see a long tail or a cluster of extreme values. Your instinct? Flag them as outliers. Trim the noise. Clean the dataset.

But here’s the thing: not all skewed data is dirty. Skew can carry meaningful structure about the real-world process you’re modeling.

In this post, we’ll break down how to distinguish expected skew from true anomalies—and avoid costly mistakes in your EDA pipeline.


1. Understand What’s Generating the Data #

Many real-world processes naturally produce skewed distributions. For example:

If you trim here, you’re cutting real signal.


2. Leverage Domain Knowledge #

Outliers are context-dependent. $5,000 in revenue may be huge for one team, normal for another. Talk to SMEs. Ask:


3. Compare Empirical Distributions to Theory #

Overlay histograms or Q-Q plots against known distributions:


4. Use Transformations as a Diagnostic Tool #

Try log, square root, or Box-Cox:


5. Don’t Rely on Arbitrary Cutoffs #

The “1.5×IQR” rule isn’t gospel. It assumes symmetric distributions.

Instead, try:


6. Analyze in Context #

Break down the data:

Outliers often vanish in the right slice of the data.


7. Use ML or Statistical Tools for Support—Not Final Judgment #

These help—but you still need to interpret the results.


Conclusion: Respect the Tail #

What looks like an outlier might be the tip of a trend. EDA is about understanding—not just cleaning.

Before trimming:

👉 Skew isn’t always a sign of a problem. Sometimes it’s the story your data is trying to tell.

Tags:
Categories: